❤️ Support Me

← Back to Home

As I begin this exploration, I imagine truth as an absolute. I ask myself, "What if truth were truly absolute? What would that even look like?"

I envision a singular, unchanging truth—an ultimate root, the source from which all else arises. If such a truth exists, it would hold the answers to everything—past, present, and future—like a mantra that contains all knowing. It would be untouched by time, space, or identity—an absolute, immovable constant. Regardless of perspective or era, it would remain ever true. Everything known and unknown would either converge upon it or emerge from it. In such a reality, ambiguity and uncertainty would cease to exist. I would see with absolute clarity what was, what is, and what will be.

But if such a truth exists, can it truly be grasped? Or is the certainty I seek itself an illusion?

Yet as I reflect, a tension arises. If worldly truths were to be absolute, then the future should unfold in a way that is inevitable and knowable. Would that not imply a deterministic world—one where uncertainty is merely an illusion? But the world I live in is anything but fixed; it is unpredictable, shaped by forces beyond my control, bending under the weight of countless unknowns.

I turn to the past, seeking certainty there, and again, it slips through my grasp. Memories fade, perspectives shift, and what once seemed unquestionable grows murky with time. The truth I once held with conviction now appears layered, evolving as my understanding deepens.

If worldly truth were to be truly absolute, would it not remain untouched by these distortions? And yet, everywhere I look, truth seems to shift, to unravel. So, is there such a thing as absolute truth? Or is it something different?

This leads me to wonder: Perhaps my current truth is not absolute, but relative. Could it be a shared understanding that emerges as a collective agreement? A guiding principle that helps us navigate our shared realities, yet never a fixed endpoint? If so, are these the most agreeable truths merely starting points, forever subject to refinement, reinterpretation, and deeper inquiry?

The truths I hold today, the ones I hold tightly to, feel close to absolute. Yet, I sense that they are not absolute at all. They are near-truths, awaiting further clarity, evolving with time, with new insights, with new understanding.

Is this how truth works? Does it evolve, just as I evolve? Or is there still something deeper—something unchanging—that I have yet to grasp?

If absolute truth does not reside in the past or future and instead evolves as I evolve, then where should I look? The truths I hold now are shared understandings—collective agreements that guide my way. But are they stepping stones to something greater, or merely constructs that shift as I shift?

I’ve often questioned whether scientific or mathematical truths might stand as exceptions—fixed, immutable truths. But as I reflect on this, I realize even science does not claim absolutes. Its truths hold only within specific conditions and are always subject to refinement. Change the conditions, and the conclusions change. Even mathematics, often regarded as the purest of all disciplines, rests on foundational axioms—assumptions we accept but cannot prove as absolute. If these frameworks pointed toward absolute truth, they would ultimately converge upon a final, unchanging certainty. Yet they do not. They expand, adapt, and evolve alongside human understanding.

If even the most structured and logical systems are in flux—forever refining rather than arriving—then can they ever lead to absolute truth? Or are they, too, simply evolving reflections of our own growing awareness, revealing not a fixed endpoint but an ever-unfolding process?

In my daily life, I rely on shared understanding, golden truths. I rely on the collective wisdom that has stood the test of time—truths that help guide me through the world. Yet history has shown me that even these truths are not impervious. What is accepted as truth today may be overturned tomorrow, and what is false today may one day be validated. How can I remain so certain in my convictions, then?

This uncertainty reminds me to stay humble. To remain open. I ask, "Can humility be the key to unlocking greater truths?" It seems to be so. Humility is an invitation to honesty, and I have come to see how self-deception clouds my vision. When I deceive myself, when I hold onto assumptions or biases, I distort my inner compass. It’s in these distortions that confusion and misalignment take root.

Confronting these distortions, peeling back the layers of my self-deception, is no easy task. It requires patience, reflection, and, most of all, courage. But as I look deeper, as I face these shadows, I feel myself drawing closer to a purer, more authentic understanding of truth.

There is a paradox here that fascinates me. My mind craves clarity, yet it also reshapes uncertainty into something manageable. Sometimes, this means bending lies into truths, simply to cope with the unknown. Is this merely deception, or is it survival? Perhaps it’s both, a defense mechanism to create stability in a world that constantly shifts.

I sense that truth, for me, is not something external. It is deeply personal, relative to my own consciousness. The more I explore this, the more my journey feels less about seeking a truth and more about refining my awareness, deepening my consciousness and exploring within. Is this how I approach truth—by expanding my awareness, by evolving my understanding of the truth?

In moments of stillness, I find myself drawn to practices that nurture my quest for deeper, absolute truth—devotion, surrender, faith. Trusting in something beyond my limited perception—whether that be the wisdom of nature, a higher power, or the guidance of a teacher or true self — has been transformative. When I let go of ego, when I embrace humility, I find myself open to truths that transcend my individual perspective.

I reflect: Could truth be something that exists beyond my narrow self-view?

I come to realize that truth is not an external object to be discovered, but an internal reality that unfolds as my awareness deepens. If absolute truth exists, it must be unchanging—something toward which all understanding would inevitably converge. But how do I know if my path leads me closer to it rather than into an ever-evolving illusion?

The test is in convergence itself. If my understanding were purely subjective, it would shift unpredictably, fragmented and inconsistent. Yet, as I strip away biases, question assumptions, and refine my awareness, I notice something striking: my insights do not scatter—they align. Patterns emerge, clarity deepens, and what once seemed contradictory begins to reconcile. The more I do this, the more my understanding stabilizes toward something fundamental, something unwavering.

If absolute truth exists, it must be that which remains when all distortions are removed. And if my pursuit reveals increasing coherence rather than chaos, then I am not merely seeking truth—I am moving toward it. I am converging not just with self, but with an essence that has always been present, waiting to be fully realized.

This journey isn’t just an intellectual exercise; it’s a deeply personal one. The more I uncover the illusion of truth, the more I realize that the truth I seek is not separate from me. It is me. It is within me, unfolding in tandem with my own consciousness.

I sit quietly, reflecting on the nature of truth. I wonder: what is truth, really? Is truth something we can simply find?

I feel the urge to explore, to question what I have always assumed. What if truth is not something that can be fully grasped or expressed within the framework of human comprehension? If absolute truth exists, it must be unchanging and independent of perception. Yet, everything I know is filtered through perception, shaped by experience, and subject to evolution.

If truth were merely an external object to be found, it would imply that understanding is a matter of accumulation—a collection of facts leading to a final revelation. But what if the very nature of truth defies accumulation? What if it is not something to be acquired but something to become? If absolute truth is beyond comprehension, then no amount of knowledge can contain it. Instead, one must align with it—not by knowing, but by being.

I sit in stillness, questioning the assumption that truth must be human-centered. Why have we placed ourselves at the center of everything, as though our perspective is the benchmark for all that is real?

Is it because we believe that it is our exclusive ability to question and reason, to explore the world with our minds? Or could it be that we’ve simply assumed this role out of convenience—because we experience the world through our senses and minds, and everything seems to filter through that lens? But what if this is not the whole story?

The human perspective, so rich in complexity, is undeniably valuable. It allows us to engage with the world in ways that no other species appears to, but does that mean our way of seeing should be the ultimate measure of truth? I begin to wonder if this assumption isn’t a bit limiting.

After all, we are just one species among countless others, inhabiting a small planet in a vast universe. How can we be sure that our way of knowing is the only—or even the best—way to understand the cosmos? Other forms of life—animals, plants, even the unseen forces of nature—exist in ways that are far beyond our comprehension. What if their experiences of the world contain truths that are simply beyond our grasp, truths that don't conform to human categories or even human language?

I pause and consider: is it possible that we are blind to realities that lie outside our limited perceptions?

The language we use to describe reality is deeply shaped by the patterns of human thought. Yet one must wonder—does reality, in its essence, owe allegiance to these structures we impose? Must truth, in its purest form, submit to the contours of human language and understanding? Or does it remain untouched, silent, beyond the reach of all that seeks to define it?

I begin to sense that truth may not need to be bound by human definitions. Could it be that we’ve mistakenly placed ourselves at the center of existence? In doing so, we’ve assumed that truth itself must follow our logic, our perceptions, our needs. But if truth is truly universal, must it be confined to the limits of what we can observe, measure, and articulate?

This leads me to reconsider the role of perception. If perception is always in flux, ever refining yet never complete, then it can only approximate truth, never embody it. The process of shedding illusions, stripping away bias, and refining awareness may not grant me full knowledge, but it brings me into alignment with what is unchanging. In this way, I do not claim to comprehend absolute truth, but I move toward it—not as a distant object, but as an underlying reality I must embody.

I feel a shift within myself. Maybe truth doesn’t exist only in the space of human experience; maybe it extends far beyond us, beyond what we can understand or articulate in our limited language.

If we release the assumption that human experience is the only lens through which truth can be understood, what happens? Do we open ourselves to a deeper, more expansive form of knowing? One that isn’t limited by our self-constructed boundaries?

Perhaps the quest for truth is not about finding something that fits neatly within human parameters. Perhaps it is about accepting that the vastness of truth cannot be captured entirely by human perspectives. It may be something far greater, unfolding in ways we cannot yet comprehend.

I sit with this realization, feeling both humbled and liberated. Truth is not something to be possessed, nor is it bound by what I can comprehend. It is neither a fixed point nor a concept to be grasped, but something infinitely vast—beyond language, beyond perspective, beyond the limits of perception itself. And in surrendering the need to contain it within human terms, I free myself to experience reality as it is, unfiltered and whole.

As I move forward, I see that the search for truth was never about reaching an endpoint but about deepening my alignment with it. This journey is not a means to an end—it is the unfolding itself, the ever-expanding realization of being. The art of living lies in the act of exploring, questioning, and dissolving illusion, step by step drawing closer to a deeper reality that has always been within.

And so, I ask once more: What is the nature of truth? Where does it lead? The answer no longer lies in seeking, but in becoming true. Truth is not something external to be found—it is something to embody. In the act of becoming true, I do not accumulate knowledge but shed falsehood. And in this shedding, I find both clarity and purpose, continuously converging with the infinite, with the essence that was never separate from me to begin with.

This realization—the shift from truth as an object to be discovered to truth as a state of being—marks a critical turning point in the journey. It is the moment when one stops seeking externally and begins to turn inward, refining their consciousness to match the ever-evolving truth.

Truth is not lost—it is simply beyond reach from the standpoint of the seeker. Just as a circle cannot be drawn with straight lines, the mind cannot attain unity through thought. The seeker must dissolve, and the observer must vanish. As long as the sense of 'I' persists, truth is obscured and becomes inverted into illusion. What you see, touch, and call 'truth' is only its outer manifestation, never its true essence. To know the truth is not to comprehend it intellectually; it is to embody that which cannot be divided.

The journey toward truth, then, becomes the journey within—a continual unfolding of self-awareness. In a universe that is infinite, where every form, every phenomenon is impermanent and relative, absolute truth cannot reside in the outer display of forms. If the absolute truth were to be fully present within this dynamic, ever-changing universe, then the universe itself would collapse into stillness, into the indivisible nature of the absolute—where no motion, multiplicity, or separation could exist. That has not happened. Therefore, what we experience here must be a reflection, a shimmering illusion cast by the light of the real.

This world, then, is not false in essence but illusory in perception—a mirror in which fragments of truth flicker, distorted by the ego and colored by identity. To seek truth in the external is to chase shadows. The only way is inward. This inner work, this Manthan, is the turning of the self upon itself—a sacred churn that dissolves the layers of illusion, identity, and inherited belief.

It is not the universe that yields truth, but the being that becomes still enough to see through it. And in that seeing, we begin to live authentically, not as personalities seeking definition, but as reflections yearning to return to their source. The closer we move to that still center, the more our actions align with true karma—effortless, ego-less, and timeless. For the truth has never been somewhere out there. It has always been waiting within us, silent and whole, beyond the noise, beyond even the self.

This step is the most crucial one, for it is here that the path forward becomes clear. Manthan, the inner churning, begins. This process requires deep introspection, an unwavering commitment to strip away falsehoods, and the courage to face uncomfortable realities. It is a continual process of refining the self, honing one’s awareness, and transforming consciousness with every insight and revelation.

And so, as I move forward, I commit to this ongoing process of Manthan—the constant refining.

The Path Ahead: A Quiet Reflection

As we begin this journey together, take a moment to reflect: Are you ready for what lies ahead?

The only true prerequisite for what follows is your willingness to surrender and commit to your innermost truth. This is where your journey begins—and this commitment is the final step. Once you make this inner surrender, everything else flows naturally from it. The rest of this book reflects nothing more than my experience of this surrender, and as you move forward, you will experience the same truth in your own unique way.

Manthan does not promise quick fixes or neatly structured frameworks. It is not about step-by-step instructions or finding external answers. Instead, it invites you into a deeper, more personal process of self-discovery—a journey that may feel uncertain at times, one that calls for unlearning and uncovering who you truly are. If you are looking for structured tools or formulas to follow, this may not be the journey you expect. Manthan is not about achieving something external; it is about living with true purpose and discovering what you are truly meant to be.

Once you commit to surrendering to your true self, all that follows is a recognition of the singular, absolute truth that already resides within you. This truth, though personal, is universal, and no matter what framework, path, or method you choose, you will come to recognize the same truth in your own life. This journey may not always be easy, but it will be profoundly fulfilling, rich with moments of bliss, insight, and connection.

So, if you are ready to embrace this unfolding with an open heart, allow your mind to surrender fully and explore at your own pace. There is no rush. Manthan is about being in harmonious flow with yourself, allowing your authentic truth to unfold naturally. For those who choose this path, it offers a deeper connection to your true self—free from distinctions between "win" or "loss," "happiness" or "sadness", "success" or "failure". It is simply effortless karma, flowing with the rhythm of blissful life.

Wherever you are on this path, the journey is yours to take in your own time and way. This work does not construct a theory of truth. It deconstructs the conditions that give rise to the illusion that such a theory is possible. Surrender, and silence are not conclusions—they are what remain when illusion ends.